首页> 外文OA文献 >Tort Liability: A Minefield for Managed Care?
【2h】

Tort Liability: A Minefield for Managed Care?

机译:侵权责任:管理医疗的雷区?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The restructuring of health insurance contracts and health care delivery systems under managed care is the result of competitive attempts to reduce the inefficiencies that developed in medical markets under traditional indemnity insurance. Liability rules that continue to apply norms of customary care threaten to undermine these potential efficiency gains. Liability rules under managed care should treat claims for denial of coverage as contractual disputes, to be brought against health plans as residual claimants. Where contracts are ambiguous, appropriate coverage should be determined using a cost-benefit criterion based on beneficiaries’ willingness-to-pay. Liability claims for negligent care should be permitted only against providers, not against health plans, except where the plan voluntarily assumes liability by contract. Extending liability for negligent care to health plans is likely to distort liability decisions and constrain the competitive evolution of delivery systems. These principles should apply equally to all plans, regardless of their status under the Employer Retirement Income Security Act.
机译:在管理式照护下对健康保险合同和医疗服务提供系统进行重组是减少传统医疗保险下医疗市场效率低下的竞争性尝试的结果。继续采用习惯护理规范的责任规则有可能损害这些潜在的效率提高。管理式照护下的赔偿责任规则应将拒绝承保的索赔视为合同纠纷,将针对医疗计划的索赔视为剩余索赔人。如果合同含糊不清,则应根据受益人的付款意愿,使用成本-收益标准确定适当的承保范围。对于过失护理的责任索赔仅应针对提供者,而不是针对健康计划,除非该计划根据合同自愿承担责任。将过失护理责任扩大到卫生计划可能会扭曲责任决定并限制分娩系统的竞争发展。这些原则应平等地适用于所有计划,无论其在《雇主退休收入保障法》中的地位如何。

著录项

  • 作者

    Danzon, Patricia. M;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号